The copyright to the phrase "New World Order" belongs to America Online Time Warner.
The worlds largest media and information distributing corporation; in which owns ABC News the channel that first reported voting problems in Florida during the 2000 presidential election.
The first of the many lies orchestrated by the Bush administration on the American people.

The so-called fatherland, Germany spawned the "Nazi Sympathizers" here in the United States in the early days before WWII and before Hitler obtained total power in Germany.
Actually the German invasion started long ago, back to the year 1838.
That is when the first German super colony was established in what is now known as the city of Anaheim located in Orange County California.
Orange County is also the source of strong republican voting influence for the entire country.
The Nazi war machine was funded by wealthy Americans, such as Rockefeller, Du Pont, Ford, JP Morgan and many other prominent U.S. citizens anticipating a German victory that would have made their fortunes increase immensely.

It is time for the source of racism here in America to be forced out into the open.

Why would senator Lott have so much racial inability to get along with others?

The answer is that the wealthy in this country tried to over throw the world in the past and today their wealthy sons and daughters are following in their Nazi foot steps.
Here in the United States, in the year 2002, people still do not relies that World War I I would not have taken place if not for the many U.S. large companies aiding the Nazi such as IBM, which provided key information about individuals sent to Hitler's (Final Solution) death camps.
Rockefeller's (Standard Oil) now known as Exxon, GM, Ford Motors, Alcoa Metals and financial power houses such as Chase Manhattan, as well as Prescott Bush's Union Bank German steel connection; all further sinister intolerable racism, manifesting into extreme hatred turning into human genocide.

The world today is full of untold truths from, the wealthy Americans financially assisting Hitler, to Sept.11 in which is the operation designed to insight the citizens of the United States into a never ending war on terrorism an attempt to bring about the New World Order for the second time.
But, the most sinister lies in human history involves the mini questions about, is there intelligent life other than human and where do they exist.
Why is this lie of alien life in junction with the other great lie of U.S. Nazi collaboration.
The answer is that the are the same, working toward a common goal of world domination through the distribution of alien technology which will profit the New World Order into victory.
This world of human lives has been mentally and financially full of manipulation for the purpose of aiding only a pre determined breed of people such as those who fit into a Nazi New World Order.

I am immensely honored that C2News is the first to release this information to the world, not like the cable TV mini series on the Science Fiction channel entitled "Taken" produced by Steven Spielberg sponsored by IBM that clouded the truth about alien existence with half truths and Hollywood fantasy.

The information below is the smoking gun for all alien researchers following a government conspiracy.
This information is buried in the U.S. library of congress in order to protect the companies privileged to obtain alien technology, unfortunately this technology has been distributed by a group holding a deep rooted mind set of racism, dating back to the early 1940's.
The technology has been given to mostly German and U.S. floating corporations based in third world countries, which do not profit from this alien technology based manufacturers union.
This information listed below is possibly the most important document in modern mankind.
This document is all the evidence one needs to understand the existence of alien life other than human and why people want to preserve their financial power.

This information is exactly as it appears on the Library of Congress web site and has not been alter.

Uruguay Round Agreements Act, below
**************************

[Federal Register: April 17, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 74)] [Notices]
[Page 19287-19366] [[Page 19287]]_Part II Library of Congress Copyright Office Copyright Restoration of Works in Accordance With the Uruguay Round Agreements Act; List Identifying Copyrights Restored Under the Uruguay Round Agreements Act for Which Notices of Intent To Enforce Restored Copyrights Were Filed in the Copyright Office; Notice[[Page 19288]] LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Copyright Office [Docket No. 97-3D] Copyright Restoration of Works in Accordance With the Uruguay Round Agreements Act; List Identifying Copyrights Restored Under the Uruguay Round Agreements Act for Which Notices of Intent To Enforce Restored Copyrights Were Filed in the Copyright Office AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Congress. ACTION: Publication of Eighth List of Notices of Intent to Enforce Copyrights Restored Under the Uruguay Round Agreements Act. ---------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Copyright Office is publishing its eighth list of restored copyrights for which it has received and processed Notices of Intent to Enforce a copyright restored under the Uruguay Round Agreements Act Publication of the lists creates a record for the public to identify copyright owners and works whose copyright has been restored for which Notices of Intent to Enforce have been filed with the Copyright Office. Generally, this is the concluding NIE list of titles for copyright owners whose eligibility to file in the Office expired on December 31, 1997.EFFECTIVE DATE: April 17, 1998. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marilyn J. Kretsinger, Assistant General Counsel, or Charlotte Douglass, Principal Legal Advisor to the General Counsel, Copyright GC/I&R, Post Office Box 70400, Southwest Station, Washington, D.C. 20024. Telephone: (202) 707-8380. Telefax: (202) 707-8366.SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:I. Background The Uruguay Round General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) (Public Law No. 103-465; 108 Stat. 4809 (1994)) provide for the restoration of copyright in certain works that were in the public domain in the United States. Under section 104A of title 17 1 of the United States Code as provided by the URAA, copyright protection was restored on January 1, 1996, in certain works by foreign nationals or domiciliaries of World Trade Organization (WTO) or Berne countries that were not protected under the copyright law for the reasons listed below in (2). Specifically, for restoration of copyright, a work must be an original work of authorship that on the date of restoration: ----------------------------------------------
\1\ The URAA's amendment of 17 U.S.C. 104A replaced section 104A under the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (Public Law No. 103-182, 107 Stat. 2057, 2115 (1993)). The Uruguay Round Trade Agreements, Texts of Agreements, Implementing Bill, Statement of Administrative Action, and Required Supporting Statements, H.R. Doc. No. 316, 103d Cong., 2d Sess. 324 (1994). See 60 FR 50414 (Sept. 29, 1995). ----------------------------------------------
(1) was not in the public domain in its source country through expiration of term of protection; (2) was in the public domain in the United States due to: (i) noncompliance with formalities imposed at any time by United States copyright law, including failure of renewal, publishing the work without a proper notice, or failure to comply with any manufacturing requirements; (ii) lack of subject matter protection in the case of sound recordings fixed before February 15, 1972; or (iii) lack of national eligibility (e.g., the work is from a country with which the United States did not have copyright relations at the time of the work's publication); and (3) has at least one author (or in the case of sound recordings, rightholder) who was, at the time the work was created, a national or domiciliary of an eligible country. If the work was published, it must have been first published in an eligible country and not published in the United States within 30 days of first publication. See 17 U.S.C. 104A(h)(6). A work meeting these requirements is protected ``for the remainder of the term of copyright that the work would have otherwise been granted in the United States if the work never entered the public domain in the United States.'' 17 U.S.C. 104A(a)(1)(B). Under the URAA, copyright in restored works vests automatically on the date of restoration. 17 U.S.C. 104A(a)(1)(A). That date is January 1, 1996, if the particular nation was already a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO) or the Berne Convention. Otherwise, the effective date of restoration is the date of a particular nation's adherence to the WTO or the Berne Convention or the date when the President issues a proclamation extending copyright restoration to that nation. Although the copyright owner may immediately enforce the restored copyright against individuals who infringe his or her rights on or after the effective date of restoration, the copyright owner's right to enforce the restored copyright is delayed against reliance parties. Typically, a reliance party is one who was already using the work before December 8, 1994, the date the URAA was enacted. See 17 U.S.C. 104A(h)(4). Before a copyright owner can enforce a restored copyright against a reliance party, the copyright owner must file a Notice of Intent (NIE) with the Copyright Office or serve an NIE on such a party. An NIE may be filed in the Copyright Office within 24 months of the date of restoration of copyright. Alternatively, an owner may serve an NIE on an individual reliance party at any time during the term of copyright; however, such notices are effective only against the party served and those who have actual knowledge of the notice and its contents. NIEs appropriately filed with the Copyright Office and published herein serve as constructive notice to all reliance parties.II. Administrative Processing Pursuant to the URAA, the Office is publishing its eighth list identifying restored works for notices of intent to enforce a restored copyright filed with the Office. 17 U.S.C. 104A(e)(1)(B). The earlier lists were published between May 1, 1996, and January 30, 1998. 61 FR 19372 (May 1, 1996), 61 FR 46134 (Aug. 30, 1996), 61 FR 68454 (Dec. 27, 1996), 62 FR 20211 (April 25, 1997), 62 FR 44842 (Aug. 22, 1997), 62 FR 66766 (Dec. 19, 1997), and 63 FR 5142 (Jan. 30, 1998). To allow for processing this NIE information, the Office closed the record for publication approximately two weeks before forwarding this record for publication. Accordingly, the NIEs listed herein are those entered into the public records of the Office between January 21, 1998 and April 3, 1998. NIEs not processed by April 3, 1998, will appear on the next four-month list, to be published on August 14, 1998. NIEs for works restored to copyright on January 1, 1996, must have been postmarked on or before December 31, 1997, to be accepted in the Copyright Office for publication in the Federal Register. See 17 U.S.C. 104A(d)(2). NIEs that were received in the Office too late for Federal Register publication will be returned to the remitter unrecorded, and the fee will be refunded. On the other hand, owners of works that are still within their eligible filing period may continue to file such notices with the Copyright Office and receive constructive notice, and the Office will continue to publish a list of eligible NIEs in the Federal Register.III. Correction of Previously Filed NIEs Correction NIEs for major errors (essentially, major errors in title and owner information) on any NIE filed must be submitted within the eligibility period. 37 CFR 201.34 (d)(6)(i). Minor[[Page 19289]]errors may be corrected at any time without regard to eligibility for filing, pursuant to the interim regulation on Correction NIEs, published at 62 FR 55736 (Oct. 28, 1997).IV. On-Line Availability of NIE Lists Using the information provided herein, one may search the Office's database to obtain additional information about a particular NIE. NIEs are located in what is known as the Copyright Office History Documents (COHD) file, which is available from computer terminals located in the Copyright Office itself or from terminals located in other parts of the Library of Congress through the Library of Congress Information System (LOCIS). Alternative ways to connect through Internet are (i) the World Wide Web (WWW), using the Copyright Office Home Page at: http:// www.loc.gov/copyright; or (ii) connect directly to LOCIS through the telnet address at locis.loc.gov. WWW is available 24 hours a day. LOCIS is available 24 hours a day Monday through Friday, U.S. Eastern Time; Saturday, until 5 p.m.; and Sunday after 11 a.m.2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Not all files are available after 9:30 p.m. on weekdays. On Sundays, all files may not be available from 5 p.m.--8 p.m. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information available online includes: the title or brief description if untitled; an English translation of the title; the alternative titles if any; the name of the copyright owner or owner of one or more exclusive rights, the date of receipt of the NIE in the Copyright Office; the date of publication in the Federal Register; and the address, telephone and telefax number of the copyright owner. If given on the NIE, the online information will also include the author, the type of work, and the rights covered by the notice. See 37 CFR 201.33(f). For the purpose of researching the full Office record of NIEs on the Internet, the Office has made online searching instructions accessible through the Copyright Office Home Page. Researchers can access them through the Library of Congress Home Page on the World Wide Web by selecting the copyright link. Select the menu item ``Copyright Office Records'' and/or ``URAA, GATT Amends U.S. law.'' In addition to online records, images of the complete NIEs as filed are on optical disc and available from the Copyright Office.V. Alien Properties Custodian Act The Register of Copyrights has received several inquiries about the ``Alien Property Custodian'' exclusion in the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA), Pub. L. No. 103-465, 108 Stat. 4809 (1994). That provision excludes from copyright restoration under the URAA ``[a]ny work in which the copyright was ever owned or administered by the Alien Property Custodian and in which the restored copyright would be owned by a government or instrumentality thereof.'' 17 U.S.C. 104A(a)(1)(B)(2). The legislative history of the URAA is silent on the application and scope of this exception. See Statement of Administrative Action, H. Doc. No. 103-316 (1994). The purpose of this notice is to provide background information to guide those seeking to determine whether or not the exception applies to a particular work.A. Background--Alien Property Custodian The Office of Alien Property was established under the authority of the Trading with the Enemy Act (50 U.S.C. app. sec. 39, 62 Stat. 1246 (1948)), to handle problems involving assets in the United States owned by nationals of enemy countries in the Second World War. The Alien Property Custodian was empowered to ``hold'' copyrights in works in which an enemy foreign country or its nationals had an interest, and require that all royalties due for use of those works be paid to the United States government. As many as 300,000 vested copyrights were controlled by the government in 1960, according to a House Report (No. 2091, July 31, 1962, to accompany H.R. 9045). The acquisitions were accomplished through a series of vesting orders, recorded with the U.S. Copyright Office and published in the Federal Register. These vesting orders caused ownership of the physical materials (for example, film prints) and copyrights for specific works to ``vest'' with the Attorney General of the United States. In 1962, Congress returned most of the remaining seized copyrights to the copyright owners in their countries of origin, although the United States retained the right ``to reproduce, for its own use, or exhibit any divested copyrighted motion picture films.'' Pub. L. No. 87-846 (1962). Title to the physical prints of these motion pictures was transferred to the Library of Congress under Pub. L. No. 87-861 (1962), giving the Library ``complete discretion to retain such prints and to reproduce copies thereof, or to dispose of them in any manner it deems appropriate.'' The current copyright status of works once held by the Alien Property Custodian will depend on a number of variables. One such variable is the age of the work; the term of protection for pre-1923 published works will have expired. Another variable is the extent of compliance with formalities under prior U.S. law. While some copyrights were renewed by the Alien Property Custodian, some of the works may have fallen into the public domain for reasons including failure to renew or other lack of compliance with formalities. These works that did fall into the public domain due to lack of compliance with formalities may have been restored to copyright by the restoration provisions of the URAA, described below. Assuming that such works were otherwise eligible, whether they were restored turns on whether they fell within the Alien Property Custodian exception to restoration.B. The Exception to Restoration Under the URAA for Works Held by the Alien Property Custodian Under a new section 104A of title 17 of the United States Code created by the URAA, copyright protection was restored on January 1, 1996, in certain works of foreign nationals or domiciliaries of World Trade Organization (WTO) or Berne countries, or at a later date for countries subsequently joining WTO or Berne. To qualify for restoration, a work must be an original work of authorship that is not a United States work and is not in the public domain in its source country through expiration of term of protection. Rather, the work must be in the public domain in the United States due to noncompliance with formalities, lack of subject matter protection in the case of sound recordings fixed before February 15, 1972, or lack of copyright relations between the country of origin and the United States. 17 U.S.C. 104A(h)(6). One category of works, however, was not restored even if the work met the above requirements. Specifically, under the ``Alien Property Custodian Exception,'' a work was not restored if (1) the copyright was ever owned or administered by the Alien Property Custodian, and (2) the restored copyright would, as of January 1, 1996, be owned by a government or its instrumentality. 17 U.S.C. 104A(a)(2). A work is excluded from restoration under the exception only when both elements of the exception are met. Determining whether a particular work falls within the exception may be complicated. As to the first element of the exception, the vesting orders described above would indicate which works had been held or administered by the Alien Property Custodian. There is no one source where these vesting orders may be found. However, the [Page 19290]]following are the publicly available sources of those lists or copies of vesting orders of which the Office is aware: on file at the U.S. Copyright Office (LM-403) are the ``Annual Reports of the U.S. Office Of Alien Property, 1942-1949,'' which contain lists of vesting orders; on file at the Motion Picture, Broadcasting, and Recorded Sound Division of the Library of Congress (LM-336) is a list, ``Motion Pictures of German Origin Subject to Jurisdiction of the Office of Alien Property.'' Finally, vesting orders are searchable under ``Alien Property Custodian'' in the Copyright Office Documents File at the U.S. Copyright Office (LM-459). All the rooms referred to above are located in the James Madison Building of the Library of Congress, 101 Independence Avenue, S.E., Washington, D.C. In addressing the second element, ownership of a restored copyright is determined by the law of the source country of the work. 17 U.S.C. 104A(b). It appears that some Axis countries nationalized certain producers of creative works during World War II, and ownership of their works may therefore have vested with the then-current government. In cases where this occurred, if the government or its instrumentality still owned the copyright as of January 1, 1996, the URAA would not have restored copyright protection in the United States for that work. The recent inquiries regarding the Alien Property Custodian exception concern the validity of Notices of Intent to Enforce (NIE) filed with the Copyright Office for works potentially subject to this provision. Under the URAA, the owner of a right in a restored work may file an NIE to notify reliance parties 3 of its intention to enforce its right. The Copyright Office is required by law to publish in the Federal Register ``lists identifying restored works and the ownership thereof if a notice of intent to enforce a restored copyright has been filed.'' 17 U.S.C. 104A(e)(1)(B)(i). The Office does not research the facts stated in Notices of Intent to Enforce to determine whether a work is or is not eligible for restoration. Nor does the Office adjudicate between competing parties who have filed NIEs for identical works. (Under section 104A, however, a material false statement knowingly made with respect to any restored copyright identified in an NIE makes void all claims and assertions made with respect to such restored copyright. 17 U.S.C. 104A(e)(3)). Accordingly, the filing of an NIE indicates only that a party has claimed to own rights in a restored work; the filing does not represent a determination by the Copyright Office that this claim is valid. In all cases, the validity of such a claim is governed by the terms of the relevant law, including the URAA, as applied to the relevant facts. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ In general terms, a reliance party is a business or individual who, relying on the public domain status of a work, was already using the work prior to the date of enactment of the URAA on December 8, 1994. 17 U.S.C. 104A(h)(4). -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -VI. Eighth List of Notices of Intent To Enforce The following restored works are listed alphabetically by copyright owner; multiple works owned by a particular copyright owner are listed alphabetically by title. Works having more than one copyright proprietor are listed under the first owner and cross-referenced to the succeeding owner(s). A cross-reference to the composite owner (e.g., Title I owned by ``A B & C'') will state, ``SEE A B & C'' at the listing for each individual owner (e.g., for Owner A, for Owner B and for Owner C).AB Svensk Filmindustri. Hamnstad.
Hets.
Till gladje.
Torst.
Tystnaden.
ABC-Film GmbH (Germany). SEE Friedrich Wilhelm-Murnau-Stiftung, legal successor of the ABC-Film GmbH (Germany). Agrasanchez Linaje, Rogelio.
Los vampiros de Coyoacan.
Airone Cinematografica SRL
****************************
This information is located in the library of congress website at;

C2News stands for Peace, Freedom and No War Forever.
The most Con2versial news creating a free world for our children's children etc..
Story by,
Roy Sawyer

Chief Reporter for the
Con2versial News and Media Network Inc.